Blanks RG, Kelly RS (2010). Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid-based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high-grade dyskaryosis? Cytopathology 21:368-73.
Ciesla MC, Guidos BJ, Selvaggi SM (2001). Cytomorphology of small-cell (neuroendocrine) carcinoma on ThinPrep cytology as compared to conventional smears. Diagn Cytopathol 24:46-52.
Denton KJ, Herbert A, Turnbull LS et al. (2008). The revised BSCC terminology for abnormal cervical cytology. Cytopathology 19:137-57.
Duggan MA, Akbari M, Magliocco AM (2006). Atypical immature cervical metaplasia: immunoprofiling and longitudinal outcome. Human Pathol 37: 1473-81.
Faquin WC, Brown FM, Krane JF, Renshaw AA, Cibas ES. Extensively keratinized squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix are difficult to grade. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115:80-4.
Herbert A, Bergeron C, Wiener H et al. (2007). European guidelines for cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology. Cytopathology 18:213-19.
Landy R, Castanon A, Hamilton W et al. (2015). Evaluating cytology for the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Cytopathology 2015 [E-Pub ahead of print]
Nayar R, Solomon D (2004). The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria and Explanatory Notes, 2nd Edn. New York: Springer; 2004.
Nayar R, Wilbur DC (2015). The Bethesda System for Reporting Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria and Explanatory Notes, 3nd Edn. New York: Springer; 2015.
Slater DN, Rice S, Stewart R et al (2005a). Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of cervical intra-epithelial lesions, as some of the Bethesda system definitions require amendment. Cytopathology 16:168-78.
Slater DN, Rice S, Stewart R et al. (2005b). Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of cervical intra-epithelial lesions, as some of the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment. Cytopathology 16:179-92.
Smith PA, Turnbull LS (1997). Small cell and ‘pale’ dyskaryosis. Cytopathology;8:3-8.
Steinman S, Smith D, Chandler N et al. (2008). Morphologic, patient and interpreter profiles of high-risk human papillomavirus-positive vs. –negative cases of atypical squamous cells of undermined significance. Acta Cytol 52:279-85.
Williamson BA, DeFrias D, Gunn R, Tarjan G, Nayar (2003). Significance of extensive hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal smears. Acta Cytol 47:749-52.